This is an excerpt of an exchange i'm having with a certain elder in our community. i thought i'd share it here with an invite to add to my (and your?) consciousness on this topic. Feel free to take this and post it on other faerie communal sites/boards!
i have to say that while i find myself on the fence on this topic, i am in agreement with you and the other elders whom have been taking the stand your are speaking of. Having said that, i see that the youth that you all have collectivley held on your shoulders (i.e. after, what, more than 20 years of fae community) are now only trying to take fae sensibility into places that their desires are going. New directions like becoming inclusive of women; and that those new directions make sense in today's realities as these youth feel them.
Even tho they are missing the polytricks of a lot of this, i think (i.e. where their approach has become "black and white" or "either/or").
Still, my own seeing is that the way in which this is happening sounds a lot like the political police (i.e. today's version of COINTELPRO) are influencing the nastier parts of how this vision wants to be implemented; i.e. as "each side" seemingly remains incapable of bridging between (and empathizing with) each others' positions. [Note: What the contexts of this seemingly impossible gap are, are perhaps many even tho i think they can all 'boil down to' one prevalent phenomenon, the one doing with "the generation gap"--which in itself is an artificially-promoted gap led by the political police both overtly and covertly]
Where our oft-spoken empathy *should* bring ecstatic room (much room) for dissent and grey area seeing, in actuality we are experiencing the superficiality of those claims and desires that have not been able to be practiced in such a way where they can be pivotal when *it truly counts*.
As far as faggot-centered decision-making on this? Well, a lot of the young generation are in on this; they are the leaders as far as i can tell; sooo, that means, FAGGOTS ARE making these decisions, divisive as they are, apparently.
i know my own experience in the context of faggots wanting women on the land; in the initial phases of women being invited, they become *more equal* than common faggot males like myself. So that's certainly an interesting phenomenon. Our need for sanctuary is being relegated to the sidelines as womenfolk are recruited (right word?) into the creation of something more dynamic (ultimately) than earlier renditions of faggotry and faggot community.
So it's the transition that i think we ought to cast our magick upon, my friend.
But of course, we are dealing with such in the context of more than 30 years of political police/Rollback efforts to divide our generations from each other (and not to mention the ramifications and reflections of oppressed faggot elder sensibilities now judged without empathy and in the most alienating ways; i.e. the prevalence of the phenomenon called "objectification" of each other amongst the elder portion of faggots, and today's safer approaches where "objectification" has to be evolved from in the younger generations' desires).
What do YOU think about all of THIS?
re: My friend said, in part:
but I truly feel they have no interest in understanding the roots of the fae movement and more pointedly the purchase of Wolf Creek. Because I know where those ideals came from and who made some of those decisions I am now the bad guy... Guess what.... I didn't really fit into any group when i was younger and now I find I do not fit in with another group.... another one that is finding no problem in opressing me.
i have to say that while i find myself on the fence on this topic, i am in agreement with you and the other elders whom have been taking the stand your are speaking of. Having said that, i see that the youth that you all have collectivley held on your shoulders (i.e. after, what, more than 20 years of fae community) are now only trying to take fae sensibility into places that their desires are going. New directions like becoming inclusive of women; and that those new directions make sense in today's realities as these youth feel them.
Even tho they are missing the polytricks of a lot of this, i think (i.e. where their approach has become "black and white" or "either/or").
Still, my own seeing is that the way in which this is happening sounds a lot like the political police (i.e. today's version of COINTELPRO) are influencing the nastier parts of how this vision wants to be implemented; i.e. as "each side" seemingly remains incapable of bridging between (and empathizing with) each others' positions. [Note: What the contexts of this seemingly impossible gap are, are perhaps many even tho i think they can all 'boil down to' one prevalent phenomenon, the one doing with "the generation gap"--which in itself is an artificially-promoted gap led by the political police both overtly and covertly]
Where our oft-spoken empathy *should* bring ecstatic room (much room) for dissent and grey area seeing, in actuality we are experiencing the superficiality of those claims and desires that have not been able to be practiced in such a way where they can be pivotal when *it truly counts*.
As far as faggot-centered decision-making on this? Well, a lot of the young generation are in on this; they are the leaders as far as i can tell; sooo, that means, FAGGOTS ARE making these decisions, divisive as they are, apparently.
i know my own experience in the context of faggots wanting women on the land; in the initial phases of women being invited, they become *more equal* than common faggot males like myself. So that's certainly an interesting phenomenon. Our need for sanctuary is being relegated to the sidelines as womenfolk are recruited (right word?) into the creation of something more dynamic (ultimately) than earlier renditions of faggotry and faggot community.
So it's the transition that i think we ought to cast our magick upon, my friend.
But of course, we are dealing with such in the context of more than 30 years of political police/Rollback efforts to divide our generations from each other (and not to mention the ramifications and reflections of oppressed faggot elder sensibilities now judged without empathy and in the most alienating ways; i.e. the prevalence of the phenomenon called "objectification" of each other amongst the elder portion of faggots, and today's safer approaches where "objectification" has to be evolved from in the younger generations' desires).
What do YOU think about all of THIS?
re: My friend said, in part:
but I truly feel they have no interest in understanding the roots of the fae movement and more pointedly the purchase of Wolf Creek. Because I know where those ideals came from and who made some of those decisions I am now the bad guy... Guess what.... I didn't really fit into any group when i was younger and now I find I do not fit in with another group.... another one that is finding no problem in opressing me.
-
Re: getting to the crux of fae youth/elder visionary seeing, re: women on our lands
Wed, June 11, 2008 - 6:21 AMI've been following this "topic" a lot.
No where do I hear about the fact that way back when, there existed this phenomenon referred to as separatism.
If I remember correctly(and my mind was not clouded by the clouds of marijuana that seemed to hover everywhere back then-no criticism, just observation) women (particularly lesbian separatists) had a jump on a lot of this gathering and alternative earth centered stuff.
There were men, such as myself who would have loved to participate, but were told, by virtue of our anatomy, that our presence, however benign, was not welcome.
I realize this is all water under the bridge, but gay men at the time, had to do it for themselves. What has become to be known as the "faerie" movement seems to be an outgrowth (some might say co-option) of that.
I remember living at Elwha (a community in Western WA, started roughly at the same time as pre-Nomenus Wolf Creek.) where the men living on the land were specifically asked to leave for women's events-I being one of them at the time. Elwha was not a gender exclusive place.
I guess I'm still adjusting to post-radical lesbian feminist sensibilities. I remember a lesbian friend tell me that "girl" was no longer a gender exclusive term.
Not that I'm taking sides. I guess I'm just wondering why women want to have anything to do with the faeries, when, historically they've had their own spaces, rituals, etc. -
-
Re: getting to the crux of fae youth/elder visionary seeing, re: women on our lands
Wed, June 11, 2008 - 11:44 AM>I guess I'm just wondering why women want to have anything to do with the faeries
>when, historically they've had their own spaces, rituals, etc.
Dear Nettle,
I wrote this poem a few years back. Perhaps in it you will find some answers to your question.
The only change I would make today is that the list of Faeries I love has become much, much longer.
love Stella
27 Reasons Why I Am a Faerie
Because the first time I came to Wolf Creek,
ten years ago
a naked man I didn't know
embraced me tenderly and said "Welcome home."
Because I came to love this Land.
Because the creek gave me my name Standing Wave
and Grandmother Maple held my handfasting and unpartnering.
Because the Naraya Tree is one of the roots of my soul.
Because I have made paella and watermelon gazpacho
for eighty people in blazing summer heat in this kitchen.
Because my blood and my come are in the Mayhole.
Because my dear brother-sisters are Faeries.
Because I love Ellipsis and Lambchop and Ampersand and Sage
and Cobb and Jackpot and Stevee and Frieda B and Eric and
Andre and Jerako and Prizm and Ladybug and Iz Crow and Rabbit
and Luna and Khol and Kyle and DreamEagle and Web and Aunt B
and you
and you and you
and you love me.
Because I have circled with my sisters and my mothers and my grandmothers
and now I need to circle with my whole family.
Because I honor and support men's mysteries and faggot space.
Because I have healed and found power in women's circles,
and I want that for you too.
Because I love to see a Goddess-worshiping man.
Because I love men and all the ways you have of being men
sissyboys and drag divas and smart geeks and butch guys in skirts.
Because Faeries generally are
more playful and wise about gender
than dykes generally are.
Because nobody, but nobody, plays dress-up like the Faeries.
Because men being intimate and tender with men heals my heart.
Because you don't need me to have your feelings for you
or cook your dinner
or clean up your mess.
Because men working through their sexist programming
and their gender-role bullshit
heals my heart.
Because men fucking men makes me wet!
Because you tumble and cuff like lions
and strut your fierce plumes.
Because your sex dance is beautiful
and different than the one I learned.
Because I need community for my magic.
Because I am tired of being
the queerest person in the room at pagan events.
Because no one else I know
is working this flavor
of heart magic body magic
sacred gender theater magic
world-changing ecstatic magic
in circles under the sky.
Because you believe heart circles are important
and you have the patience for consensus
and you're not scared of chaos.
Because you honor me
as Spirit in another self
two-spirit woman
priestess
sister-goddess.
Because I honor you
as Spirit in another self
two-spirit man
priest/ess trickster
horned one elder
brother-god
who dances with Shakti at the heart of creation
whose dying makes the grain rise
whose seed is the stars of heaven.
March 2006
-
-
Re: getting to the crux of fae youth/elder visionary seeing, re: women on our lands
Thu, June 12, 2008 - 12:55 AMThis thread is also on California Radical Faeries Tribe but with this additional post from Hermeticbear which I've taken the liberty of copying and pasting to this tribe, as I feel it's very well written and eloquent.-JTF
herm...
hermeticbear
offline 34
Re: getting to the crux of fae youth/elder visionary seeing, re: women on our lands
Yesterday, 9:22 AM
I find the key phrase to your friends answer is this
"another one that is finding no problem in opressing me"
He sees oppression in the world around him constantly. I also see it as being made personal, when in most cases, it probably isn't. However, I do recognize the need and space for male only space. I also recognize that need for inclusiviness, and that it is happening with the currently youthful generation of faes, as they have not experienced the violence that was practiced against the older generation of faes, where many basic human and civil rights were denied to us.
At the same time I question the majority of the youth and thier desire to include women in male designated space. As I have experienced and had confirmed by many friends, the current generation is afflicted by what I recognize and a friends calls the "Will and Grace Syndrome". Because of deeper issues regarding thier sexuality, social role and status, shame, acceptance and self-esteem, many gay youth subsititute meaningful gay relationships with shallow female relationships. They are afraid of connecting with other gay men, and emotional and spiritual intimacy that it takes to really make a relationship successful (while perhaps they maneuver the seas of physical intimacy constantly) and so they make these connections with a female, who acts as a surrogate. I have noticed many people of this type in queer enclaves, and they are often socially awkward and prone to excess in mind altering substances (alcohol being the least of them) so that they may feel more comfortable in dealing with men, while seeking physical intimacy. Some of these people, may be seeking the inclusion of thier female surrogates, because they are afraid and mistrusting of thier male peers and elders because of interior issues, which can only be set aside when they are under the influence of chemical substances.
I recognize that there are exceptions to this trend, and many fae's maintain positive and healthy connections with women of all sorts. I also believe that these people also recognize the space for Males is as important as a mixed space, as important as a female only space, as important as a space for people who share a similar quality to commune and connect with each other, without having to feel bad or be demoralized because of thier desire to connect in a defined space and energy.
I would also like to add that I am coming from a witchcraft tradition that has a 20+ year history of male only space, but has a counterpart that is female only space, and in the past (but not that I know of recently, mostly because of distance and small numbers) that these two counterparts come together to create a shared space, but both recognizes the need for sex identified only space.
reply to this post
*
cosm...
cosmic-ly craZy
offline 24
getting to the crux of fae youth/elder visionary seeing, re: women on our lands
Tue, June 10, 2008 - 7:46 PM
This is an excerpt of an exchange i'm having with a certain elder in our community. i thought i'd share it here with an invite to add to my (and your?) consciousness on this topic. Feel free to take this and post it on other faerie communal sites/boards!
i have to say that while i find myself on the fence on this topic, i am in agreement with you and the other elders whom have been taking the stand your are speaking of. Having said that, i see that the youth that you all have collectivley held on your shoulders (i.e. after, what, more than 20 years of fae community) are now only trying to take fae sensibility into places that their desires are going. New directions like becoming inclusive of women; and that those new directions make sense in today's realities as these youth feel them.
Even tho they are missing the polytricks of a lot of this, i think (i.e. where their approach has become "black and white" or "either/or").
Still, my own seeing is that the way in which this is happening sounds a lot like the political police (i.e. today's version of COINTELPRO) are influencing the nastier parts of how this vision wants to be implemented; i.e. as "each side" seemingly remains incapable of bridging between (and empathizing with) each others' positions. [Note: What the contexts of this seemingly impossible gap are, are perhaps many even tho i think they can all 'boil down to' one prevalent phenomenon, the one doing with "the generation gap"--which in itself is an artificially-promoted gap led by the political police both overtly and covertly]
Where our oft-spoken empathy *should* bring ecstatic room (much room) for dissent and grey area seeing, in actuality we are experiencing the superficiality of those claims and desires that have not been able to be practiced in such a way where they can be pivotal when *it truly counts*.
As far as faggot-centered decision-making on this? Well, a lot of the young generation are in on this; they are the leaders as far as i can tell; sooo, that means, FAGGOTS ARE making these decisions, divisive as they are, apparently.
i know my own experience in the context of faggots wanting women on the land; in the initial phases of women being invited, they become *more equal* than common faggot males like myself. So that's certainly an interesting phenomenon. Our need for sanctuary is being relegated to the sidelines as womenfolk are recruited (right word?) into the creation of something more dynamic (ultimately) than earlier renditions of faggotry and faggot community.
So it's the transition that i think we ought to cast our magick upon, my friend.
But of course, we are dealing with such in the context of more than 30 years of political police/Rollback efforts to divide our generations from each other (and not to mention the ramifications and reflections of oppressed faggot elder sensibilities now judged without empathy and in the most alienating ways; i.e. the prevalence of the phenomenon called "objectification" of each other amongst the elder portion of faggots, and today's safer approaches where "objectification" has to be evolved from in the younger generations' desires).
What do YOU think about all of THIS?
re: My friend said, in part:
but I truly feel they have no interest in understanding the roots of the fae movement and more pointedly the purchase of Wolf Creek. Because I know where those ideals came from and who made some of those decisions I am now the bad guy... Guess what.... I didn't really fit into any group when i was younger and now I find I do not fit in with another group.... another one that is finding no problem in opressing me.
-
Re: getting to the crux re: women on our lands
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 1:04 AMOK so Most people here have heard what I have to say on this before...
but I would like to reiterate or summarize it here for the new generation of this debate.
I come from being raised in a truly matriarchal Civilization where the women control the wealth and the blood lines... and I see the wisdom of that.
the men have lodges in every town and village in their nation...
the women have lodges in every town and village as well.
it empowers them all.
their Nation has the strongest MEN I have ever seen and the Strongest WOMEN.
they do not consider it a separation... they consider it as 2 legs the tribe stands on...
the Whole tribe meets in both halls when they have the need.
there are also some Special men who work with the women in the kitchens as well, they seem to have a Unique relationship with those women ... (like Sisters) but on the Down Low when white folks are around... if you get my meaning.
I guess I have been sort of the poster child for the campaign to uphold M4M Space... (it has brought me alot of HATE from younger faes (or maybe it is because I am FAT? I do not think so, but maybe...)but it is the many who 'oppress' me and those like me... really seem to have closed minds. do not want to come to some compromise... they want what they want when they want it... IMO.
Most do not realize that those who work so hard to maintain SOME Margin of M4M Space in the Nomenus also support the idea of mixed gatherings, even the idea of a women's gathering on the land. you sure can not say that of the women’s sanctuary down the road... or the women’s temple in Portland (and No One is telling them they should or they are dinosaurs etc... )
It seems that many are terrified to be in all male space... for me the great spiritual longing, (and feeling of safety to be myself) I have for those spaces... (that I do not feel when women are present) are something to be treasured and savored... and protected from the threat of ‘assimilation‘.
Women have taught us for years that they understand the power of spaces with their peers...
most women around Nomenus understand the value of Men finding the same empowerment with other ‘Men’ (and yes you can get bent on the labels and gender issues... but for the sake of this conversation we have to have SOME Name for what we are speaking of). there is Great Power when Men (Or Fagots or whatever label you can cope with) come together to heal eachother... and NO ONE who has experienced it think it is the same as when women are present.
It is my Belief that until a man or ‘boy/man’ experience this... they have NO IDEA what is possible.
men have been reliant on women for comfort and compassion and healing and nurturing most of there lives... what is so scary about space that is set aside in the world for them, to find those Qualities in themselves? and to share that with their Brothers? why do SO MANY want to eradicate that?
the greatest lesson we could learn from the women, is how to be with each other and DO FOR OUR SELVES? I believe THAT was what Nomenus originally was about. Safe Space to explore that.
Oh and HeartCircles... that is whole other subject... why do the ‘younger faes’ so fear that tradition? I think there is a connection.
It has been called: “Resonant VS Harmonic” magic... I think Teddybear expresses that more clearly than I could... but maybe it is time to review that Idea as well he tells it better than I could...
let us also not forget that Kinsey suggested that there might be as many as 70% of the male population may be Bisexual... and that was considered a ‘minority group’ for years... but Nomenus included those brothers in our Church. so I guess it is no big surprise to realize not how many of them might women to Join us... but where does that leave us faggots who NEED M4M space? tough luck?
This is NOT by the way, a strictly generational issue... (as many might like to draw the line) many Younger Faes have come to me over the years and Secretly have confided that they value M4M space too... but that they do not feel it is safe to express this to their ‘peers’ so who is “oppressing” Who?
Years ago at the Seattle GC there was a meeting of the minds... it was really Quite beautiful.
a compromise was met, where Nomenus extended the opportunity to umbrella the pangender community to Organize and self actuate a plan, a way to raise funds from their gatherings ... to buy land... not with the idea that they were not welcome at Wolf Creek... but could respect the FAGGOT nature of the sanctuary and grow a new branch on our family Tree... or a new tree in the forest of family spaces, if you will... it was a break through ... there were lots of tears of joy and reconciliation... even apologies from some pangenderists to the elders who came to explain the intention of Nomenus founders. (jerrythefae can speak to that if he wants).
since then there has been Some talk ... and NO action.
there have been Many who would plug their ears and run away... “la La LA la... “?
there has be a years long struggle to put together a policy that would respect M4M Space when it is called... (witch many have blocked the conversations about and most still do not know the policy...)
there have been many times that when m4m space has been called and it is violated... not to mention the hostile letters to Nomenus “wake up and smell the pussy” by crystal cobra, springs to mind...
but lets face it... the younger generation does not have a motivation to Organize and fund raise, when they can kick grampa in the Nuts and take his farm for free... (or so it would seem). and once again we are Right back where we started with a bunch of people who think this is a brand new topic and that they are “being Oppressed”.
I personally would speak with who ever wanted to work out some compromise that laid this to rest....
I would love to see some the elder faggots who helped make WC happen come back to the land (Yup their not all dead, just many feel unwelcome) ... I love the M4M Sacred spaces I used to love before this divisive subject blocked out the sun.
in all the world the Faggots and Homosexuals deserve a place to think of as a homeland... their are very few left... because we were so welcoming and open to our “Friends”. for some of us that is a bitter pill to swallow. the Idea that there may never be another faggot beltane at wc makes me sad.
with Love and Respect to all that offer it in return.
Will I am
LaBette -
-
Re: getting to the crux re: women on our lands
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 6:03 AMCompromise or a cease fire in place?
From reading the previous debates in this tribe it appears that a big fracture occured about a decade ago when a woman was given long term visitor status at the sanctuary by residents living on the land. The objections came from faeries living in other locations. One problem may be that Nomenus cannot find residents who are willing keep male only space 24/7-365 days a year. This should tell us something about where reality is leading us.
Standing in the way of compromise seem to be two extremes. One would never allow women (and apparently FTMs or straight people) the other extreme would not allow m4m space at all. Not sure if there much room for compromise between those two.
I posted in another tribe that the current situation could provide the basis for at least a temporary settelment of the issue. Nomenus would still allow only gay male members, m4m gatherings would continue and the ability to declare exclusive space between scheduled mixed gatherings would still be possible. The current schedule Beltane, Solstice, etc (mixed gender) would go on and residents could approve long term visitors reguardless of gender.
If this has come down to a generational issue then the writing is on the wall. If the sanctuary has a future it will eventually be in the hands of younger generations of faeries. Since change is inevetable perhaps the few who hang on to tradition should show some leadership and stand aside in the consensus process and allow the change to happen with less acrimony. -
-
Re: getting to the crux re: women on our lands
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 7:54 AMWill I Am, In your post you mention that some faeries may hate you possibly because you are fat. I know the pain that such attitudes can cause. It occurs to me that body weight is but another arbitrary category that others could use to exclude one from the land. This IMHO would be just as wrong-headed as the current list of excludable people, which seems to get longer.
At the risk of being facetious I wonder how long that list is becoming. According to some faeries there should never be women on the land. Others object to FTMs and probably MTFs. Hetros are not welcome according to some and of course bisexuals upset some faeries.
Is there to be some sort of a physcial inspection before gatherings? I can guarantee you that many bi's have just lied and said they were gay in order to attend all male gatherings. -
-
Re: getting to the crux re: women on our lands
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 8:14 AM>Nomenus would still allow only gay male members, m4m gatherings would continue and the ability to declare exclusive space between >scheduled mixed gatherings would still be possible. The current schedule Beltane, Solstice, etc (mixed gender) would go on and residents >could approve long term visitors reguardless of gender.
Apostate, I think the "compromise" you're describing actually represents current Nomenus policy.
My understanding is that women can visit the sanctuary as long as others on the land consense to let them, and as long as faggot-only space or other gathering boundary is not invoked. (If others have better information, I hope they will clarify.)
love Stella -
-
Re: current Nomenus policy
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 2:06 PMStella is correct.
this IS the current Nomenus policy...
there has been a long history of violation of the male only space when it IS called. that is still an issue.
(how to respectfully create and respect that boundary?)
More often than NOT... 'Pressure' put on caretakers to Just let so and so come to dinner... (or stay over night ... or finally come to pack up her camp that she left erected on the land while she was away for months... that sort of thing...) the fact is, that when women are not present there is more Nudity... more casual intimacy and the atmosphere IS Different. and it takes a day or 2 to get back to that posture.... after a visit from a woman... if it gets there at all, when wondering when the NEXT time a woman will Magically appear in Calamus ...
Men are much more 'polite' and proper when the real women are around, in my experience... more reliant on them for nurturing and it brings out Chivalrous programming that will really Screw m4M space... (IMO)
As far as FTMs and MTFs... we welcome both... we even had one come to GC a couple of years ago and Disrupt the entire proceedings (for a whole day) to INSIST that 'he' be made a member... very militant... (I Sort of liked him) but no one said "show us your dick" and later we find out that despite his/her boyish appearance... others would later have a pussy being toweled in their face at wolf creek when this brother stepped from the shower and put his "foot up on the couch arm and toweled it in their face"... this person reportedly had been pregnant twice and had no intention to make the full transition... ? some say this is a gay male ... I do not... even though I Like herm. (women would not be as tolerant that is for sure)
We have had Fae Brothers who were MTF and who are even now welcome visitors on the land during mixed gatherings... and in the off gatherings times... but we acknowledge them as FEMALE out of respect to the choice they have made... and the self made actions they have taken to make it so... and they choose NOT to be members since they are NOT Gay MEN anymore...
at that Seattle great circle that set the standard (FOR ME) on how we do things... one young 'man' came and shed tears and was really torn on whether or not he could sign the membership form and be accepted... and he said that he had a penis... but also had had a period since he was 12-14... his acceptance as a member was a Sweet thing to see... and I have held him in my heart ever since as a brother/sister and have told him that he embodies what most of us feel as "2 spirits" .
Is the reward of being that open and inclusive all these years, to be the loss of the Faggot Homeland by those who feel entitled to it now?
That hardly seems FAIR. what kind of “Friends” come to VISIT and then try to move in? I say they are NOT Friends at all. (More like Squatters) even if they help with the chores and pay for their part of the food.
This is not a hard thing to get.
It has been worked on for years by those who care about this topic...
It has been blocked and denigrated for years by those who have a Singular agenda.
and Just want what they want. even if contrary to the founding Ideas.
I personally know NO ONE, that wants the sanctuary to be Male only 24/7/365 Never heard it from anyone except the ones who CLAIM that is what the M4M people want... I have heard it from no one who wants M4M Space honored...
But the fact is, that THE CHURCH OF NOMENUS is a GAY MEN'S CHURCH.
Bisexuals need not Lie to be at M4M gatherings... but they DO if they want to be a member of the Church. the by laws say a "GAY IDENTIFIED MAN." I think many have.
The men who have the most to share with the younger ones, have been called 'Dinosaurs', Misogynists, predators, and every other dirty name... in the book...
they tell me there is little chance of sexual intimacy for them at gatherings... because of ageisum. (I personally do not care... that is Icing on the cake for me IF it happens, and so long since it DID happened at a Fae Gathering, that I never expect it.)
For me (and many others) gatherings are about something more than that... and if they are just going to be outcasts and HeartCircles are going to be 1/4 of the participants at best... why go?
the Spiritual gathering of RAD FAES has taken a real dive (until the last couple of years... ) and had become a party of indulgence only... no that there is anything wrong with that being a PART of gathering... but the Spiritual/tribal component has taken a real beating...
As far as Long term visitors go... NO ONE even a woman (who often are there) can be consensed to be a visitor more than 30 days at a time. and are subject to the restrictions mentioned by Stella.
At present there are No Official Caretakers (god I hate that word) on the land.
I have always thought that land Stewards or Church Stewards would be Much more appropriate... but Just one more area where I get over ruled... and that is OK.
It seems there has been a long history of Factions on the land, Alienating one group (or individuals) or another... people who seem to see them self's with “rings of power“ ... or entitlement because they do work there... and get to live there... as many wish they could but can not.
I think it is a Privilege... and like Monks in a Monastery (opps sorry not that kind of monk) that they are in service to The Church and THE Goddess (meaning the earth itself)
I admire Harry Hay on many levels... but he was by no means a good role model for EGALITARIAN “Non Higherarchal leadership“.... and I am Not sure that wolf Creek has ever seen what that functionally looks like. ? what a JOY it could be, if we would all Just get back to the basics of what we CLAIM to be. what is spelled out by the founders. and grow from there...
much of what is done now... has Lost sight of Subject/subject consciousness ... and Non Higherarchal Egalitarianism.
did you know that at the GC 2 times ago... that 3 members (now officers) blocked me from reading the definition (out of the dictionary) of the word :"egalitarian"? ...as part of our opening ritual? it was a sad moment for Nomenus process since NO ONE (as far as I know) ... has ever been blocked from contributing what they choose to, in an opening ritual. really sad...
and now even the COCO list is subject to Censorship...
and our president does not see the org as a “Church”... sad really sad.
but those are whole other topics.
blessings to all! (even the corrupt.)
William
-
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 2:22 PMwell A
I think it all stems from the departure ... or Slow Drift away from what "Faerie" once ment...
like with so many great groups and communes and such... people are drawn to something powerful... then in the absence of a charasmatic leader... it degrades... brings a whole lot of periferal people and it be comes Party central ... alcohol and Cigs get introduced... and it all turns into Party zone mentality (again nothing wrong with that in proportion) but then many of the core members (dare i say Spiritual members) become alienated... and Leave... and then then it is mostly young partiers left... this is of course a broad generalization... but I have seen it over and over...
but the fact is that a Faerie raised in HeartSpace and in the frame of mind to respect Subject/Subject conciousness is much less Likely to fall in to Clique mentality... and start thinking of ways to Silence others ... or gain personal control of process... or think of others as OTHERS.
they are much more likely to value the process that they are apart of and everyone has an equal voice and WORK toward a compromise with those they love and who have embraced THEM.
I Know that was true for me when I first came to this church... with a lover.
it was the happiest place I have ever known... but back then I Knew it as nothing else but Calamus.
I think that when the sanctuary let one get hauled from HeartCircle in chains (by the Law) without letting them speak was a real turning point for the church. some holy pact was broken. our most sacred space had been violated.
now there are many who want to control the land... or be "Den Mother" (Yuch!) and those who have not been driven away ... and have stood up and made a stand are the pariah...
so wheather you are Fat or Old or trans or any other lable...
it should still be safe to shed the frog skin...
and if it is Not... then Something is Seriousely WRONG.
shouldn't that be the priority? to figure out where that went wrong?
I think as Long as there is ONE FAGGOT MAN who NEEDS Sanctuary... than WolfCreek should be there for them. that is what the people who paid for the land intended. and to SOMETIMES include our Friends... not the other way around.
If women want to mingel with Faggots... how about a mixed gathering at THEIR Sanctuary? for a change.
William
-
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 10:55 PMOne can still be a proud, open Gay man with many long, strong ties with Radical Faeries, Wolf Creek, and Nomenus back to day one, and still get banned from being a member of a faerie church one helped found way back when, and had worked with well for years.
Please, spare the character assassinations, the false judgements feted by closed groups of prejudiced self-interests, and all the miss-truths a few power queens waging spiritual warfare with their nails dug firmly in the corporal power of an earthly church may exercise.
I remember once a dream of subject/subject consciousness,
of the gentle love of my brothers.
If they hate you, as hate is an easy power generator,
for those addicted to such highs
of exercising corporeal roles and edicts,
then the door gets closed
on you.
And they send out the hounds,
and one day they may find
a burned corpse
forgotten in a beautiful watershed. -
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sat, June 21, 2008 - 11:17 PMgee Vaughn... I mean Heretic... thats pretty grim even for you. -
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:02 AMExhibit # A
The Beast.
Vengeance is the Beasts,
bray about it's prey
tell stories
while it accuses others
of telling stories.
Church stories,
you see,
are cobbled together
in closed faerie circles,
where the fiction
is better unfettered
by subject/subject clap-trap.
Perfect blasphemy,
recite it now,
Beast.
I applaud
you psychic rainbow warriors. -
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:04 AMWhat was
the name
in the movie
you made?
Interesting.
-
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:03 AMMixing gender politix with ageism is just feeding the red herrings.
Im all for proactive discourse around emotional issues.
As for me I think there are much bigger fish to fry.
blessings to all those holding space
amidst the aftershocks -
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:05 AMIf Beasts shares others
names here,
by right
share his other
names
with
us all.
Now. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:06 AMAll
the
other
names
of
Beast
now.
All
the NAMES
of BEAST -
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:07 AMI
Know
what
you
did. -
-
-
-
Re:how long that list is becoming
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 9:37 PMfuck holding space! free space now! the fakes are out to hold on......BE WARE...!
-
-
-
-
WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 10:09 PMif any one can get ripped off, yelled at bullyed ,lied and gossiped about by so called keepers of the land.. then whats the point? eye saw how cash broke bennet was kicked out of new mexcio.. only to die a few mos. later.... bigger fish ..u bet ya... when the small fish eats a blowfish, the shit comes to the surface.... if u talk the talk ,u need to do the dance, if not u are in the way......all people have right to be safe and heard essp. if they are in faerie land.... holding space sound like like some queen wants to rule the chicken koop with out all the work, and just picking OUT the best for her self ,so that it can rot in her HOLDING SPACE floor.... it is sad thing.....proactive emotional issues what is this MAJI? bullying people in emails ,with out ur real name is that how, u learned how to hold on to ur space? blessing to the ones that free space 4 all people even the loud mouths...... be well, but be aware that actions speak louder than words ... and some really need help with how their brain works........ now about that bath house is it done yet? if i would of not been ripped off iot would have been,,,, but that s how mexcian culture is, my house is ur house, not.. ur house is my house and u pay me to live here, cause im such a mystic faggit.....oh well never mind ... how many more people have deal with this kind of im better than u shit.... how many are turn away? not just women how about folks like me with hiv. or people of color? does this matter to anyone?..... hold space.. no! free ur mind free space now no more back stabing tell it to my face.. no more killing the older freak like bennet..... i tell the truth .so what if u dont get it i lived it...gossip on queen, i dont need fake family.... u are who u hang out with... enough said -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Mon, June 23, 2008 - 5:43 AMSo a faerie who needed sanctuary was kicked out by the "holding space" crowd and later died? What ersatz spirituality do they practice anyway? WTF! It seems that more one spouts terms like "holding space," "sacred space" or namaste the more clueless they are about how to treat their fellow human beings. Any spirituality that allows them to treat others as "the other" is totally worthless. Shame on them.
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 12:13 AMActually Bennett was living homeless in Ashland Oregon for two years when he tragically died in a fire. He had been kicked out of at least three faerie sanctuaries, some of them more than once, but that was a fairly long time before his death.-JTF -
-
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 5:36 AM"He had been kicked out of at least three faerie sanctuaries...."
So we are to accept that in each of those instances the sanctuary in question was right to kick him out? What does 'sanctuary' mean if not being there for a faerie brother who is in trouble? I will take a guess that substance use and or abuse was an issue. I would also guess that it was decided that allowing him to stay is a from of "enabeling" (the great 21st century justification for failing to help somebody in trouble) The only legitimate definition of enabling would be to supply a substance for an addict. Enabeling does NOT include giving somebody a safe place to stay (you know--sanctuary) I guess that would distract the "real faeries" from their spiritual pursuits and attrempts to out-faboulize each other. Are the sanctuaries now just a place for middle class faeries to come and focus on navel gazing?
-
-
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 9:23 AMWhen someone is asked to leave a sanctuary, it's easy to criticize from the comfort of your armchair. But unless you've faced that kind of agonizing decision -- unless you've had to weigh the peace and safety of the community against the needs of someone who is psychotic, tweaking, stealing, violent, aggressive, or just an unending 24/7 pain in the ass -- and come up with a decision that honors the founding principles of the community as well as the highest good of all concerned -- and ESPECIALLY unless you are intimately familiar with the situation you're commenting on -- I suggest you do so with a great deal of humility.
love Stella -
-
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 9:55 AMStella, I doubt that you are intimately familiar with all of the situations where faeries were kicked out. I have no reason to get defensive on the behalf of those in charge. There are a number of posts I have read going back a couple of years that show a pattern of what appears to be power tripping residents (or caretakers) vibing or outright expelling other faeries. There were no examples of violence or aggression sited. I think those in charge should show some humility in their decision making. Are your observations from some vantagepoint other than an armchair? It sounds like you give leaders carte blanche just because they are leaders. -
-
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 11:59 AMApostate --
Something you may also have noticed in reading over posts from the last couple of years is a pattern of unknown faeries, posting here with anonymity, who are asked to reveal themselves or leave. And here it goes again: unless you're willing to sit with us in online heartspace, without the mask of an anonymous profile, then your comments here are invalid. This is a tribe for the faeries who gather at Wolf Creek. None of us has any reason to believe that you fit that profile, given that your online profile is completely without information.
Please take off your mask, or please stop posting in this tribe. I say this not as a leader, or even as the moderator of this Tribe (a powerless position I'm happy to hold), but as a faerie who gathers at Wolf Creek who does not feel comfortable being judged or criticized by a stranger.
And for the record: I lived at Wolf Creek for two years, and am intimately familiar with several situations where faeries were asked to leave. In every instance, the faeries were disruptive to the good of community, were a drain on communal resources and energy, and in every instance, the decisions to ask them to leave were heart-rending, and not made easily or callously. Bennett lived his life the way he wanted to live his life -- that much is extremely clear to anybody who knew him. Sometimes, he fit very well into community, sometimes, he did not. He was never asked to leave while I was living there, but I can imagine a situation in which he might have been. Sanctuary, let us remind ourselves, is for people who are actively seeking healing and community. It is not a free-for-all catch-zone for people to unload all of their problems on others. It is also not "free" -- the sanctuaries cost real, actual, American dollars to operate. Violence or aggression (and there have been instances of each, whether or not you've seen them reported in postings here) are not the only reason you may be asked to leave. Refusal or extended inability to contribute to the common pot (whether with real, actual American dollars or with real, actual work ethic) may require that you leave as well.
This is not ideal, perhaps, but then, only true Utopia is ideal. And Faerie Sanctuaries, for all their attributes both physical and meta-physical, are experiments. Sometimes, they are successful, and sometimes, their success is only a matter of a good run of fewer failures. To expect more of them, or of the stewards who do what they can to make sure the good of all is prevalent, is unreasonable, however easy it may seem to attack.
love to all,
and again, this is a no-mask zone,
Ampersand -
-
Re: WHAT IS SAFE SPACE?
Tue, June 24, 2008 - 4:24 PMAmpersand, online heartspace is an oxymoron. In fact I have found real hearspace difficult to find even in face to face encounters at gatherings. My profile is anonymous for one good reason. My boyfriend still attends gatherings in Oregon and New Mexico. Though we agree to disagree about some issues I do not wish to introduce possible controversy form him because of his connection with me.
Since you are the moderator here I will honor your request and cease posting in this tribe. I will of course post at will in other tribes the same views I have posted here. BTW, most of my critical remarks had to do with disputes in New Mexico and not at your sanctuary in Oregon.
-
-
Re: WHAT IS SAFE
Wed, June 25, 2008 - 3:14 PMProjections hurt innocent people and only enable those who are already bound to their pain.
Part of the curse sanctuaries face is bearing the brunt of disgruntled persuns who dont own their own experiences while on the land.
These are sacred spaces where people can go inward to heal and own new experiences for themselves.
I for one am willing to bet my reputation on it.
Always seem to me safest to hold only criticisms and judgments that are your own.
Or simply to forgive so that others have room to grow.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-